Anonymous participant40/100: Seems to work, but I don't know enough about encryption to know how "crackable" it'd be. Would have been nice to see the HTML be a bit more semantic (e.g. with labels for the inputs), and/or some styling, as I think there was space for one or both of those. Also doesn't incorporate the theme :(
Anonymous participant60/100: no comment
Anonymous participant20/100: Does not work for me. Decoding returns garbage
Anonymous participant4/100: Something worse than Ceaser cipher, because it doesn't wrap around (!).
Anonymous participant30/100: no comment
Anonymous participant15/100: A simple substitution cipher that would not stand cryptanalysis for long. And the form itself is buggy, one needs to reload to switch between encryption and decryption
Anonymous participant72/100: It's a simple symmetric encryption for simple text. Not really secure, though, being a substitution cipher.
Ratings
Public comments
No public comments yet.Leave a comment